Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
Monday, January 11, 2010
A Comment on Commenting
We've received many protests, complaints, heated accusations, and whining supplications about the disappearance of comments from WataugaWatch (and, yes, Virginia, we were quite aware that they disappeared!).
Call it growing pains. Or call it corporate stretching. But we've been forced to move to another comment-hosting platform which is going to take a little longer to load up and become operational.
Be patient. Our hope is that all past comments -- which are not lost -- will reappear in the new format.
Or ... this has all been a giant hoax, and we are royally screwed. I'd hope for the first possibility.
Call it growing pains. Or call it corporate stretching. But we've been forced to move to another comment-hosting platform which is going to take a little longer to load up and become operational.
Be patient. Our hope is that all past comments -- which are not lost -- will reappear in the new format.
Or ... this has all been a giant hoax, and we are royally screwed. I'd hope for the first possibility.
Labels: blogging
Friday, March 13, 2009
Goss Kills Internet Libel Bill
State Senator Steve Goss today announced he has pulled SB 46, the so-called "Internet Libel Bill," from consideration by the North Carolina Senate.
"There is a need to bring our state's slander and libel laws into the 21st Century, but this bill as written does not in any way express my intent," Goss said. "In this day where misinformation can be sent around the world, literally in minutes, both on internet web sites and by e-mail, the laws need to be updated to cover it."
Goss says that such actions may be covered by current laws against libel and slander under Common Law, "but our laws also offer protections to journalists in more traditional print and electronic media that probably do not extend to bloggers and other reporters on the Internet. These protections cover those who make factual errors but who are acting in good faith, and they should cover the newer media as well."
Goss had intended that a section of the proposed legislation would remove liability from those bloggers who post items on the Internet they later find to be false and for which they then post apologies and retractions, "but that section does not appear to be strong enough to solve the problem," he said. In addition, the legislation had included criminal penalties that appear nowhere else in current libel laws, a section that "should never have been written," according to Goss.
"I do not ever want to weaken the First Amendment in any way!"
"This area needs to be addressed in the future," Goss said, "but for now the Legislature is focusing on the state's economy and budget shortfall. When I address this issue again, I'll bring it back with a focus on protecting the First Amendment as the first order of business."
"There is a need to bring our state's slander and libel laws into the 21st Century, but this bill as written does not in any way express my intent," Goss said. "In this day where misinformation can be sent around the world, literally in minutes, both on internet web sites and by e-mail, the laws need to be updated to cover it."
Goss says that such actions may be covered by current laws against libel and slander under Common Law, "but our laws also offer protections to journalists in more traditional print and electronic media that probably do not extend to bloggers and other reporters on the Internet. These protections cover those who make factual errors but who are acting in good faith, and they should cover the newer media as well."
Goss had intended that a section of the proposed legislation would remove liability from those bloggers who post items on the Internet they later find to be false and for which they then post apologies and retractions, "but that section does not appear to be strong enough to solve the problem," he said. In addition, the legislation had included criminal penalties that appear nowhere else in current libel laws, a section that "should never have been written," according to Goss.
"I do not ever want to weaken the First Amendment in any way!"
"This area needs to be addressed in the future," Goss said, "but for now the Legislature is focusing on the state's economy and budget shortfall. When I address this issue again, I'll bring it back with a focus on protecting the First Amendment as the first order of business."
Labels: blogging, Steve Goss
Saturday, May 24, 2008
Minnesota Bloggers Create Political Havoc
See there! We've been telling ya -- or maybe we were just thinking it, or dreaming it. We lose track so easily -- that bloggers are Allies of Satan. Destroyers of Civilization. Endangerers of the Gravitational Pull.
Because they publish stuff that's true.
How dare they!
Because they publish stuff that's true.
How dare they!
Labels: Al Franken, blogging, Minnesota